Exams

Study Notes
  • Regulatory
  • Teaching Exams
Mock Tests
  • Banking & Insurance
  • SSC Exams
  • Regulatory
  • UPSC
  • MBA Exams
  • Railway Exams
  • JAIIB-CAIIB Exams
  • Karnataka Exams
  • Tamil Nadu Exams
  • Judiciary Exams
  • Law Entrance Exams
  • Agriculture Exams
  • J&K Exams
  • UP Exams
  • Rajasthan Exams
  • Uttarakhand Exams
  • Punjab Exams
  • Haryana Exams
  • MP Exams
  • Defence Exams
  • Teaching Exams
  • Chhattisgarh Exams
Previous Year Papers
  • Banking
  • SSC
  • Regulatory
  • JAIIB
  • Teaching
  • Railways
Category
  • Banking & Insurance
  • SSC Exams
  • Regulatory
  • UPSC
  • MBA Exams
  • Railway Exams
  • JAIIB-CAIIB Exams
  • Karnataka Exams
  • Tamil Nadu Exams
  • Judiciary Exams
  • Law Entrance Exams
  • Agriculture Exams
  • Engineering Exams
  • J&K Exams
  • UP Exams
  • Rajasthan Exams
  • Uttarakhand Exams
  • Punjab Exams
  • Haryana Exams
  • Bihar Exams
  • MP Exams
  • Defence Exams
  • Teaching Exams
  • Himachal Pradesh Exams
  • Chhattisgarh Exams
  • SkillVertex Courses
Chhattisgarh Exams
Engineering Exams
Teaching Exams
Himachal Pradesh Exams
Chhattisgarh Exams

Previous Year Questions

Get Detailed Solutions for Previous Year Questions for Bank, SSC, Railways and Other Popular Government Exams

Question :

Directions : Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

In March 2022, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) proposed a 5% increase in the national minimum wage, aiming to raise it from $20.33 to $21.35 per hour. This adjustment would result in an annual salary of $42,184 for full-time workers. The ACTU's initiative sought to support approximately 2.67 million employees dependent on the annual wage review for salary adjustments. ACTU Secretary Sally McManus emphasized that this raise was essential for low-paid workers to "keep their heads above water" amid escalating inflation and living expenses. ​ The call for a wage increase was set against a backdrop of significant economic challenges. In the previous year, inflation had risen by 3.8%, while wages had only seen a 1.7% increase, leading to a decline in real wages. This trend persisted into 2022, with inflation outpacing wage growth by 1.25 percentage points. The Morrison government faced criticism for its budgetary measures, which were perceived as offering only temporary relief without addressing the structural issues of high inflation and stagnant wage growth. ​

The proposal ____X____ varied responses from different sectors. Employer groups were anticipated to suggest more modest wage increases, ranging between 2% to 3%. Historically, the Coalition government had adopted a neutral stance in minimum wage deliberations, providing technical insights into the economic landscape without advocating for specific wage adjustments. McManus criticized this approach, suggesting that the government had been passive regarding wage growth initiatives. ​The political arena was also engaged in the discourse on wage adjustments. The shadow treasurer at the time, Jim Chalmers, highlighted the government's track record of overpromising and underdelivering on wage forecasts, noting that 52 of the last 55 wage projections had been inaccurate. In response, Prime Minister Scott Morrison asserted that real wages were projected to increase, attributing this to the government's success in reducing unemployment to below 4%. Treasurer Josh Frydenberg projected that the wage price index would reach 3.25% in the following year, marking the most substantial growth in nearly a decade. ​

Following these discussions, the Fair Work Commission announced in June 2022 a 5.2% increase in the national minimum wage, translating to an additional $40 per week for minimum wage earners. This decision elevated the hourly pay rate from $20.33 to $21.38, impacting at least 2.7 million Australians. The Commission cited a sharp increase in the cost of living as a significant factor influencing their decision. Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Michele Bullock supported wage increases, particularly for underpaid sectors like aged care, suggesting that such raises were justified and would have minimal impact on inflation. ​The ACTU's 2022 proposal for a 5% increase in Australia's minimum wage highlighted the pressing challenges faced by low-income workers amid rising inflation and living costs. While the Fair Work Commission's subsequent decision aligned closely with the ACTU's recommendations, the broader conversation about balancing wage growth with economic stability remains a pivotal issue in Australia's labor market.​

Which of the following statements best captures the economic context surrounding the ACTU's 2022 wage proposal?

1. The ACTU's proposed increase was aligned with wage growth forecasts issued by the Treasury and was designed to preempt a projected economic boom.

2. The government welcomed the ACTU's proposal as a strategy to stimulate consumer demand and curb the inflationary spiral.

3. The wage increase was proposed in response to a significant real wage decline, as inflation outpaced nominal wage growth in preceding quarters.

4. Economic indicators showed stable price levels and rising wages, prompting a cautious stance on further increases from the Fair Work Commission.

5. The Fair Work Commission's rejection of any wage hike reflected concerns that inflation was already subsiding and wage growth was excessive.

Correct Answer : 3
Solution :

Option (c) - Correct: The passage explicitly states that inflation rose by 3.8% while wages only increased by 1.7%, resulting in a decline in real wages. The ACTU's proposal was framed as a corrective response to this erosion of purchasing power, not a proactive move for anticipated growth.

Option (a) - Incorrect: Treasury forecasts were actually criticized for their inaccuracy - 52 out of 55 had missed the mark. The proposal wasn't tied to optimistic forecasts but rather to deteriorating economic conditions.

Option (b) - Incorrect: The government was criticized for being passive. There was no indication of support for the ACTU proposal as an anti-inflationary or demand-boosting tool.

Option (d) - Incorrect: Wage growth was lagging behind inflation, and prices were not stable, contradicting the premise of this option.

Option (e) - Incorrect: The Fair Work Commission actually approved a 5.2% increase, not a rejection. Moreover, inflation was still a concern, and wage growth was not considered excessive by the Commission.

Thus, option (c) is the correct choice.

RBI Grade B Previous Year Papers

Attempt RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYPs, get detailed solutions

RBI Grade B Phase 1 Mock Test

Attempt RBI Grade B Phase 1 Mocks in Latest Pattern

Create a free Oliveboard account to access all PYQs with solutions & video explanations

RBI Phase I PYP Test Series

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP 2024 - 8th September Shift 1

200 200 2 Hours
Free

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP 2024 - 8th September Shift 2

200 200 2 Hours

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP 2023 - 9th July Shift 1

200 200 2 Hours

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP 2023 - 9th July Shift 2

200 200 2 Hours

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP 2022 - 28th May Shift 1

200 200 2 Hours

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP 2022 - 28th May Shift 2

200 200 2 Hours

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP - 6th March Shift 1

200 200 2 Hours

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP - 6th March Shift 2

200 200 2 Hours

RBI Grade B Phase 1 PYP 2019 - 9th November Shift 1

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I Test Series

RBI 2025 Phase I - 1

200 200 2 Hours
Free

RBI 2025 Phase I - 2

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 3

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 4

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 5

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 6

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 7

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 8

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 9

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 10

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 11

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 12

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 13

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 14

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 15

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 16

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 17

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 18

200 200 2 Hours

RBI 2025 Phase I - 19

200 200 2 Hours

Record Breaking Results in 2024-25 🎉

Niranjan Jain

Niranjan Jain

Rank #1

SBI PO

Amit Mandal

Amit Mandal

Rank #1

IBPS PO

S B Tanay Gaurav

S B Tanay Gaurav

Rank #1

RBI Gr. B

Shubham Agrawal

Shubham Agrawal

Rank #1

SSC CGL

Manjot Singh

Manjot Singh

Rank #1

SSC CGL (JSO)

Rohit Chadhar

Rohit Chadhar

Rank #1

SSC CHSL

Shekhar Kumar

Shekhar Kumar

Rank #8

RBI Gr. B

Please wait...

Open in app