Let the amount loaned to Z be Rs. P.
At the end of his terms, Z would pay = P(1 + r/100)3
So, amount loaned to X = Rs. 3P/5
At the end of his terms, X would pay = (3P/5)(1 + 3r/100)2
From I alone:
P(1 + r/100)3 : (3P/5)(1 + 3r/100)2 = 3087:2116
[(100 + r)/100]3 : (3/5)[(100 + 3r)/100]2 = 3087:2116
(100 + r)3 : (100 + 3r)2 = (60 * 3087):2116
529(100 + r)3 = (15 * 3087)(100 + 3r)2 .. (i)
So, we can find the value of r. But we can't determine the value of P. So, we cannot find the amounts/interests they paid. So, I alone is not sufficient.
From II alone:
If X took Rs. P as loan, then amount paid = P(1 + 3r/100)2 - P
P(1 + 3r/100)2 - P = 2580
P(10000 + 9r2 + 600r) - 10000P = 25800000
P(9r2 + 600r) = 25800000 .. (ii)
We cannot determine P or r. So, II alone is not sufficient.
From I and II together:
We derived equations (i) and (ii) from each statement (statement I and statement II).
529(100 + r)3 = (15 * 3087)(100 + 3r)2 .. (i)
From equation (i) r=5 i.e., rate of interest = 5%
Substitute r=5 in equation (ii)
P(9r2 + 600r) = 25800000 .. (ii)
P = 8000
At the end of his terms, Z would pay = P(1 + r/100)3 = 9261
At the end of his terms, X would pay = (3P/5)(1 + 3r/100)2 = 6348
Hence the required difference = 2913
So, both the statements together are necessary.